The Supreme Court’s majority ruling Friday that repudiated the concept of universal or nationwide injunctions was remarkable for its takedown of the dissenting opinion, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told Newsmax.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the 6-3 majority, had pointed words for Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent, in which Jackson wrote that nationwide injunctions should be permissible because the courts should not allow the president to violate the Constitution.
“The principal dissent focuses on conventional legal terrain, like the Judiciary Act of 1789 and our cases on equity,” Barrett wrote. “Justice Jackson, however, chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever. Waving away attention to the limits on judicial power as a ‘mind-numbingly technical query,’ she offers a vision of the judicial role that would make even the most ardent defender of judicial supremacy blush.
Read more at Newsmax© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
