The title “prophet” isn’t on my business card, but you don’t need to be a prophet — just a student of history — to have predicted the cultural and legal conflicts unleashed by the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell decision. That ruling overturned the laws of nearly 30 states and imposed same-sex marriage on the entire country.
In the immediate aftermath of the court’s redefinition of marriage — back when cable news still allowed organizations that supported biblical marriage to appear — I said plainly: The court could make same-sex marriage a legal right, but it could not make it morally right.
I compared it to abortion, seven years before Dobbs overturned Roe. I warned that resistance to the court’s declaration, which defied not only history but also the moral law of God, would persist. Just as it defies nature and conscience for a society to accept a mother taking the life of her own child, it is equally unnatural — and morally incompatible — to claim that a sexual relationship between two men is the same, in meaning or consequence, as the life-giving union of a man and a woman.
Read more at Newsmax© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
